Close Menu
  • News
    • Broker News
    • Tech News
    • Institutional trading
    • Interviews
  • Analysis
    • Newsletters
    • Prop Weekly
    • Marketing Newsletter
    • Guest Posts
  • Learn
    • Start a broker
    • FX CFD Licensing
    • Liquidity
    • Regulations
  • About
    • What is TradeInformer
    • Who runs TradeInformer?
    • Contact
  • Subscribe
LinkedIn WhatsApp YouTube
TradeInformer
Subscribe
  • News
    • Broker News
      • ATFX trading volume stats for Q2 2025
        ATFX hits $862bn in Q2 trading volume, with equities trading up 106%
      • Exness branded youtube thumbnail for india
        Exness stops onboarding clients in India
      • crypto.com arena
        Exclusive: Crypto.com hires Leven Li to head MENA compliance
    • Tech News
      • Fortress Core Connect and Shufti Pro branding
        Fortress Core Connect partners with Shufti Pro for AML/KYC technology
      • Team Force Technologies logo
        TeamForce Technologies integrates tech stack with cTrader platform
      • Trade Tech Solutions branding on black background
        Reward systems: The Game-Changer in prop trading technology
    • Institutional trading
      • 26 Degrees James Alexander
        26 Degrees: Handling sharp flow, so brokers don’t have to
      • Rostro Group
        Rostro Group adds crypto CFDs to institutional offering
      • Hilbert Group
        TradeLocker owner Deus X Capital invests $31m in Hilbert Group’s crypto treasury programme
    • Interviews
      • Yiota Hadjilouka from cTrader speaking at a panel at iFX Expo 2025
        Spotware COO: Almost 50% of new traders download cTrader Store products
      • Sam Eder, founder of broker MarketMates
        MarketMates Founder on prop, getting an ASIC license, and helping clients succeed
      • Gareth Hazelden
        Atlantic Capital Markets: Cornwall, Dubai, and a 77k client database
  • Analysis
    • Newsletters
      • Exness whale advert
        Exness halts registrations, Indian whales, and an offshore binaries broker in the US
      • Taxi in New Delhi
        Plus500 options, India, event contracts, and MAGA
      • best forex brokers UK search in Google AI Mode
        Will AI kill forex broker affiliates?
    • Prop Weekly
      • FundedNext video screenshot
        Are FundedNext payouts real?
      • Instant Funding $5,000 free challenge giveaway advertising
        Instant Funding $5,000 giveaway – 5,000 accounts, $500,000 in marketing spend
      • Trader Thomas Hartmann, owner of prop firm Funded Unicorn
        Did Funded Unicorn just cut and run with traders’ money?
    • Marketing Newsletter
      • Axi branding at Bahia football match
        Brokers are sponsoring EM sports teams
      • Pump those numbers
      • swissqote logo
        Does branding matter?
    • Guest Posts
      • Stanislav Galandzovskyi paid marketing specialist
        Where prop firms should (and shouldn’t) be looking next for growth
      • XM prizes
        XM Is Giving $500,000 in Prizes to Worldwide Partners
      • PropShield Centroid Solutions
        Centroid Solutions Announces PropShield: A Centralized Intelligence Platform to Protect the Integrity of Prop Trading Challenges
  • Learn
    • Start a broker
      • FTMO office
        How to start a prop firm for funded traders
      • Start a forex business (that isn’t a broker)
      • St Vincent and the Grenadines
        Cheapest country to start a forex broker
    • FX CFD Licensing
      • Mauritius airport
        FX/CFD license in Mauritius
      • Seychelles island
        Start a FX/CFD broker in the Seychelles
      • Labuan FSA
        Start a forex broker in Labuan
    • Liquidity
      • trading chart on a screen
        How do prop firms make money?
      • FXIFY Homepage
        What do prop trading firms do?
      • metatrader application on phone
        STP vs A-book for FX/CFD brokers
  • About
    • What is TradeInformer
    • Who runs TradeInformer?
    • Contact
YouTube LinkedIn WhatsApp
TradeInformer
YouTube LinkedIn WhatsApp
Subscribe
Home » Are CFD affiliates going to get banned?

Are CFD affiliates going to get banned?

April 11, 20228 Mins Read Newsletters
Share
Twitter LinkedIn Copy Link Telegram WhatsApp

Greg Secker is a yeti-like man with the mien of a Marbella nightclub owner. He’s also very good at trading forex. So good that he does it on helicopters, ski slopes, and from his garden. And every day he manages to finish in the black. It’s all very impressive, flashy, and Instagrammer in Dubai-chique. Or is it?

Like the prime-of-prime piece published on this site a month ago, it’s probably not going to come as a shock to readers that some of Big G’s claims about his trading skills aren’t entirely accurate. What’s more amazing is that it’s still going on.

For years now, this person’s adverts have blared out at me from YouTube and across the internet. And all it takes is about one minute of Googling to show that what he’s saying is total bullshit.

For example, let’s look at the first block of text that appears when you click through on a YouTube ad from one of Big G’s companies, Learn to Trade.

Now if I came to you and said that I had…

  1. Worked at a bank
  2. Acquired professional trading skills while working at the bank

You’d probably assume that my job in the bank involved trading. And if I was putting that on my CV as a way of marketing a trading course, I would probably be trying to give the impression I had been on a trading team and was going to impart some of the knowledge I had acquired as a part of that team.

So did Greg Secker work on the trading team at what is now BNY Mellon? No he didn’t. He worked on an IT desk and you’d be crazy to think he was trying to give the impression he did anything else.

This is a common theme. Watching Big G’s videos is a great lesson in how to strongly imply something without ever explicitly saying it. For example:

  1. You could make £150,000 a year trading forex
  2. You could do this by only trading for about 5 minutes a day

Or to use the words of someone teaching at a seminar hosted by Greggy’s company:

“[This course] is for anyone who is seriously looking to increase their income by an extra grand a week so that they can leave their job, so that they can become financially independent and send the kids to private school next year.”

Notice that the course does not necessarily help them do these things, it just happens to be for people “looking” to leave their job or make an extra grand a week.

Why is this done? Because claiming these things as facts would be fraud. Smart!

The marketing grey zone

Ok, so maybe I’m being overly harsh in singling out Greggy Secks. But that’s because:

  1. Every time I write about him, someone from Capital Index writes me hate mail and I want to see if it happens again.
  2. I get his ads far more than any other forex/crypto faux millionaire internet person.
  3. He’s an even worse charlatan than others as he not only sells rubbish courses and crap software but then gets people to trade with a company he owns, Capital Index, so ‘customers’ (victims) lose money to him every step of the way.

The other thing I’ve never figured out is how he is able to set this up legally. Clearly no one who works at an FCA regulated company could say the sort of stuff he does in their marketing materials or sales calls to attract customers.

Affiliates may be able to but then…can you be an affiliate if you own the company you are referring people to? My guess is that it’s possible because…

  1. A combination of legal nitpicking + the techniques described above combine to make it technically acceptable.
  2. Regulatory and legal authorities don’t really care and don’t even get what’s going on.
  3. Some combination of both those points.

Whatever the case, and as much as I’m ragging on him, is what Greg Secker does so different from other people selling a service? Call me sceptical but I don’t really believe that Usain Bolt is trading cable every day with AvaTrade or that Jose Mourinho is making big bucks shorting Tesla CFDs on XTB.

Incidentally, it is one thing to acknowledge that this is the case and quite another to actually see it in person. A couple of weeks ago, I went to an event with a friend who runs an affiliate management agency for fashion brands. It’s pretty jarring to see how little the affiliates really care about the products they’re selling in real life versus knowing it in theory.

But then where do you draw the line with this stuff? Ethically it’s hard to do it but it’s even trickier from a regulatory point of view. For instance, should you only be able to market a product if you actually use it yourself? Arguably but that would probably put 99% of marketers out of work within a couple of weeks.

On the other hand, there is a distinction to be made between an affiliate and an advertiser. If you see Mourinho in an XTB advert it’s memorable and probably gives the company’s brand a level of prestige and trust among prospective consumers. 

But Mourinho, as far as I’m aware, is not posting pictures of himself in front of rented Lamborghinis on Instagram, telling people he makes £100,000 a month trading forex, getting them to sign up to the offshore entity of some dodgy broker, and then taking a commission from each trade they place.

The difference is one of perception and purpose. People see an advert with someone like Mourinho and probably know implicitly that he doesn’t actually use the product. The ad is more about trust and brand building.

In contrast, an affiliate’s goal is to make it seem as though they do use the product, often in a very specific way, and get potential customers to do the same. An advert is not going to guide you through the sign up process, specifically tell you to sign up to an offshore entity, and then ask you to deposit a minimum amount of cash, as many affiliates for CFD providers do.

Are affiliates going to get banned?

The reason all of this is the subject of this week’s post is because of some news that came in from the UK advertising regulator a few days ago. From October, celebrities and social media types will be banned from appearing in ads for gambling companies. My understanding is that this also applies to social media affiliates on sites like Instagram. 

I have no idea if this is going to happen in the FX/CFDs sector but it really wouldn’t be that surprising if it did. For instance, BDSwiss has been banned from offering services to UK customers because of the absolute charlatans it was using as affiliates to attract customers here.

The FCA also opened a consultation on “strengthening financial promotion rules for high risk investments” at the start of this year. Part of that includes a proposed ban on inducements to trade, which could make life hard for affiliates. 

Reading that document you also just get the sense that the FCA is not a big fan of affiliates, even if it doesn’t say explicitly that it’s going to ban them. Things like the BDSwiss ban make that clear too.

On one level I can understand this. There is no way that someone working at IG Group in London, for example, could phone up a new client and start talking about how they make millions of pounds trading FX for five minutes each day. But this is exactly what affiliates do. And given affiliates are effectively working for those businesses, why should that disparity be allowed?

On the other hand, affiliates work so well because they sell products that their followers, whoever they may be, are more likely to be interested in than blanket adverts. Some may abuse this position but many don’t.

Any FCA or ESMA-backed ban on affiliates probably wouldn’t make such a difference to companies, given that many of them are already just contracting them with their offshore entities. Although brokers should keep in mind that this is what BDSwiss was doing and it didn’t work out well for them.

I suppose if the regulator doesn’t ban affiliates then companies should look to work with those that don’t behave like idiots or fraudulently. This should mean you get better quality customers that will also be longer lasting. 

Alternatively, if the only way you can make money is by using fake millionaire idiot affiliates who can only attract clients by lying to them, maybe you should question what sort of business you are really running?

Have a good week everyone.

Stuff that happened:

Tickmill added more stock CFDs

Germany doesn’t want ESMA to ban payment for order flow

Conmen were pretending to be from CySEC

AvaTrade BDSwiss Capital Index XTB
Previous ArticleCMC Markets is sitting on a gold mine
Next Article IS Prime vs ThinkMarkets

Related Posts

Exness halts registrations, Indian whales, and an offshore binaries broker in the US

July 21, 2025

Plus500 options, India, event contracts, and MAGA

July 14, 2025

Will AI kill forex broker affiliates?

June 30, 2025
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Latest News

Are FundedNext payouts real?

Prop Weekly July 25, 2025

The FundedNext payout numbers are hard to understand, based on the other numbers that FundedNext has posted on their own homepage.

26 Degrees: Handling sharp flow, so brokers don’t have to

July 23, 2025

ATFX hits $862bn in Q2 trading volume, with equities trading up 106%

July 22, 2025
YouTube LinkedIn WhatsApp
  • News
    • Newsletters
    • Interviews
    • Broker News
    • Tech News
    • Guest Posts
  • Learn
    • Start a broker
    • FX CFD Licensing
    • Liquidity
  • About
    • What is TradeInformer
    • Who runs TradeInformer?
    • Contact
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
  • Follow
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    • WhatsApp
© 2025 TradeInformer

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.