Close Menu
  • News
    • Broker News
    • Tech News
    • Institutional trading
    • Interviews
  • Analysis
    • Newsletters
    • Prop Weekly
    • Marketing Newsletter
    • Guest Posts
  • Learn
    • Start a broker
    • FX CFD Licensing
    • Liquidity
    • Regulations
  • About
    • What is TradeInformer
    • Who runs TradeInformer?
    • Contact
  • Subscribe
LinkedIn WhatsApp YouTube
TradeInformer
Subscribe
  • News
    • Broker News
      • Coinbase 'everything is fine' UK brand campaign
        Coinbase launches first brand campaign targeting the UK
      • screenshot of Fundee, the AI bot developed by FundedNext
        Instant Funding, FundedNext launch AI chat products for traders
      • Pheton Holdings IPO
        Pheton: broker clients targeted in another pump and dump
    • Tech News
      • Plum investing app
        Fintech Plum increases marketing output 18x, cuts review times by 90% using AI from Adclear
      • DXtrade iSAM Securities branding
        iSAM integrates risk management tool Radar with DXtrade platform
      • Fortress Core Connect and Shufti Pro branding
        Fortress Core Connect partners with Shufti Pro for AML/KYC technology
    • Institutional trading
      • Fortress Core Connect European Union entity branding
        Fortress Core Launches European Entity, Expanding Tech and Liquidity Solutions Across the EU
      • Rostro Group
        Scope Markets owner Rostro Group gives €100k for Cyprus wildfire relief
      • 26 Degrees James Alexander
        26 Degrees: Handling sharp flow, so brokers don’t have to
    • Interviews
      • Yiota Hadjilouka from cTrader speaking at a panel at iFX Expo 2025
        Spotware COO: Almost 50% of new traders download cTrader Store products
      • Sam Eder, founder of broker MarketMates
        MarketMates Founder on prop, getting an ASIC license, and helping clients succeed
      • Gareth Hazelden
        Atlantic Capital Markets: Cornwall, Dubai, and a 77k client database
  • Analysis
    • Newsletters
      • Deriv Crash Index in cTrader
        The synthetic indices trading boom
      • Exness whale advert
        Exness halts registrations, Indian whales, and an offshore binaries broker in the US
      • Taxi in New Delhi
        Plus500 options, India, event contracts, and MAGA
    • Prop Weekly
      • fca hq
        The FCA is looking at prop – can they regulate it?
      • FundedNext video screenshot
        Are FundedNext payouts real?
      • Instant Funding $5,000 free challenge giveaway advertising
        Instant Funding $5,000 giveaway – 5,000 accounts, $500,000 in marketing spend
    • Marketing Newsletter
      • Axi branding at Bahia football match
        Brokers are sponsoring EM sports teams
      • Pump those numbers
      • swissqote logo
        Does branding matter?
    • Guest Posts
      • Stanislav Galandzovskyi paid marketing specialist
        Where prop firms should (and shouldn’t) be looking next for growth
      • XM prizes
        XM Is Giving $500,000 in Prizes to Worldwide Partners
      • PropShield Centroid Solutions
        Centroid Solutions Announces PropShield: A Centralized Intelligence Platform to Protect the Integrity of Prop Trading Challenges
  • Learn
    • Start a broker
      • FTMO office
        How to start a prop firm for funded traders
      • Start a forex business (that isn’t a broker)
      • St Vincent and the Grenadines
        Cheapest country to start a forex broker
    • FX CFD Licensing
      • Mauritius airport
        FX/CFD license in Mauritius
      • Seychelles island
        Start a FX/CFD broker in the Seychelles
      • Labuan FSA
        Start a forex broker in Labuan
    • Liquidity
      • trading chart on a screen
        How do prop firms make money?
      • FXIFY Homepage
        What do prop trading firms do?
      • metatrader application on phone
        STP vs A-book for FX/CFD brokers
  • About
    • What is TradeInformer
    • Who runs TradeInformer?
    • Contact
YouTube LinkedIn WhatsApp
TradeInformer
YouTube LinkedIn WhatsApp
Subscribe
Home » The FCA is looking at prop – can they regulate it?

The FCA is looking at prop – can they regulate it?

August 1, 20254 Mins Read Prop Weekly
fca hq
Share
Twitter LinkedIn Copy Link Telegram WhatsApp
Start a prop with ctrader

Start a prop in 5 days with cTrader

Summarise this article with chatgpt

One of the things with prop is that you look at all the ads you get for it and how much it’s being spammed everywhere and you wonder, how is this still not being regulated?

Over the last couple of months, I’ve learnt that the FCA, ASIC, and MAS are all confirmed as looking at the sector. At least one large prop has sat down directly with one of these regulators to discuss their business model and operations.

This leads to the next question of why they haven’t done anything. There are probably three things happening.

One is simply time and apathy. If you look at crypto, regulations have only really come into play in a meaningful way in the last couple of years, even though bitcoin ‘came out’ in 2009. It takes a while for regulators to do stuff. Props are no different.

The other factor is logistical. How do you regulate something that does not really fit within any existing framework and where no ‘real’ money is being traded?

For example, let’s say you make simulated trading a regulated activity. What if you are a bank’s compliance team, running a stress test using simulated derivatives trades. Is that now regulated activity in and of itself?

Alternatively, imagine you are a broker or any financial institution offering a demo account or any kind of simulated educational materials. Would that then be covered by these new rules?

Another way of doing this might be to regulate education, which is what most prop firms purport to provide, particularly for their banking and payments providers. 

Again, there are clear problems here. You cannot easily regulate financial education, as the ongoing ‘success’ of many UK educators illustrates. There would also (again) be huge indirect consequences. All market analysis by brokers, for example, would become a regulated activity if education was covered by these rule changes.

The basic point is that, as it stands, regulating prop firms is not an easy thing to do, mainly because of the knock on effects doing so would have. I also wonder if they look at it, shake their heads in despair, and then thank God that they’re not having to oversee the activities of these companies. 

The third and final point is more of a ‘conspiratorial’ one. A couple of industry executives that I have spoken to claim that, after the My Forex Funds debacle, regulators are being extremely careful about who they go after.

Basically they want to make sure they have a case absolutely in the bag before taking any actions. That makes sense but also seems to be based on hearsay. 

It also kind of contradicts the idea that this is unregulated activity. If this is not regulated, how can the regulator go after them? 

In the US, with My Forex Funds, the problem seems to have been with offering CFDs in a way that could have been construed as ‘live’ accounts. A lot of props have switched to only doing futures in the US as a result and emphasise repeatedly that it’s all simulated.

Does this mean no regulation will happen? No. But it will probably take a while and it will be interesting to see how it gets enacted. Given the model, it’s possible gaming laws would be more appropriate.

What happens if there are regulations?

A couple of months ago, I met a few people that run one prop. This is not one of the biggest, but it’s definitely a decent sized company in revenue terms.

At a certain point, I asked something like…

“Where is the rest of your team?”

It turned out they only had about five other people working for them. This is one of the weird features of props. They are basically advanced e-commerce businesses and the result is that running a prop requires fewer people than a brokerage does.

However, that is also likely to be a necessity given the economics of the business. We have looked before at payout ratios. 

The stats here vary but from what I hear it’s somewhere between 30% to 50%. 

This is a lot!

Most props offer affiliates 15% of the account challenge fee. If you are doing paid ads, the average seems to be an acquisition cost of about 10%.

Then you have psp costs (5%), technology costs (pricey), and other activities, like branding campaigns, banking costs, offices, your staff, and so on.

When you add these up, the margins in this business get smaller and smaller.

Now imagine a regulator does step in and it removes 5% to 10% from your total revenues. It’s hard not to see a bunch of props going out of business if that happens.

Previous ArticleCoinbase launches first brand campaign targeting the UK

Related Posts

Are FundedNext payouts real?

July 25, 2025

Instant Funding $5,000 giveaway – 5,000 accounts, $500,000 in marketing spend

July 18, 2025

Did Funded Unicorn just cut and run with traders’ money?

July 11, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Latest News

The FCA is looking at prop – can they regulate it?

Prop Weekly August 1, 2025

The FCA, ASIC, and MAS are all aware of prop trading. But can they actually make prop regulations and what will happen if they do?

Coinbase launches first brand campaign targeting the UK

July 31, 2025

Instant Funding, FundedNext launch AI chat products for traders

July 31, 2025
YouTube LinkedIn WhatsApp
  • News
    • Newsletters
    • Interviews
    • Broker News
    • Tech News
    • Guest Posts
  • Learn
    • Start a broker
    • FX CFD Licensing
    • Liquidity
  • About
    • What is TradeInformer
    • Who runs TradeInformer?
    • Contact
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
  • Follow
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    • WhatsApp
© 2025 TradeInformer

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.