Close Menu
  • News
    • Broker News
    • Tech News
    • Institutional trading
    • Interviews
  • Analysis
    • Newsletters
    • Prop Weekly
    • Marketing Newsletter
    • Guest Posts
  • Learn
    • Start a broker
    • FX CFD Licensing
    • Liquidity
    • Regulations
  • About
    • What is TradeInformer
    • Who runs TradeInformer?
    • Contact
  • Subscribe
LinkedIn WhatsApp YouTube
TradeInformer
Subscribe
  • News
    • Broker News
      • Exness branded youtube thumbnail for india
        Exness stops onboarding clients in India
      • crypto.com arena
        Exclusive: Crypto.com hires Leven Li to head MENA compliance
      • Damon Sze topwealthtrading managing director
        Ex-Hantec COO Damon Sze joins TopWealthTrading as Managing Director
    • Tech News
      • Fortress Core Connect and Shufti Pro branding
        Fortress Core Connect partners with Shufti Pro for AML/KYC technology
      • Team Force Technologies logo
        TeamForce Technologies integrates tech stack with cTrader platform
      • Trade Tech Solutions branding on black background
        Reward systems: The Game-Changer in prop trading technology
    • Institutional trading
      • Hilbert Group
        TradeLocker owner Deus X Capital invests $31m in Hilbert Group’s crypto treasury programme
      • ATFX Duke of Edinburgh
        ATFX Connect Joins the Duke of Edinburgh Cup City of London Qualifier 
      • Fortress Core Connect
        Fortress Core Connect gets FSCA License, strengthening local footprint in South Africa
    • Interviews
      • Yiota Hadjilouka from cTrader speaking at a panel at iFX Expo 2025
        Spotware COO: Almost 50% of new traders download cTrader Store products
      • Sam Eder, founder of broker MarketMates
        MarketMates Founder on prop, getting an ASIC license, and helping clients succeed
      • Gareth Hazelden
        Atlantic Capital Markets: Cornwall, Dubai, and a 77k client database
  • Analysis
    • Newsletters
      • Taxi in New Delhi
        Plus500 options, India, event contracts, and MAGA
      • best forex brokers UK search in Google AI Mode
        Will AI kill forex broker affiliates?
      • Limassol
        Last week in Limassol: 5 takeaways from Cyprus
    • Prop Weekly
      • Instant Funding $5,000 free challenge giveaway advertising
        Instant Funding $5,000 giveaway – 5,000 accounts, $500,000 in marketing spend
      • Trader Thomas Hartmann, owner of prop firm Funded Unicorn
        Did Funded Unicorn just cut and run with traders’ money?
      • TraxNYC picture from website
        Alpha Prime, diamond dealers, and Million Dollar Traders
    • Marketing Newsletter
      • Axi branding at Bahia football match
        Brokers are sponsoring EM sports teams
      • Pump those numbers
      • swissqote logo
        Does branding matter?
    • Guest Posts
      • Stanislav Galandzovskyi paid marketing specialist
        Where prop firms should (and shouldn’t) be looking next for growth
      • XM prizes
        XM Is Giving $500,000 in Prizes to Worldwide Partners
      • PropShield Centroid Solutions
        Centroid Solutions Announces PropShield: A Centralized Intelligence Platform to Protect the Integrity of Prop Trading Challenges
  • Learn
    • Start a broker
      • FTMO office
        How to start a prop firm for funded traders
      • Start a forex business (that isn’t a broker)
      • St Vincent and the Grenadines
        Cheapest country to start a forex broker
    • FX CFD Licensing
      • Mauritius airport
        FX/CFD license in Mauritius
      • Seychelles island
        Start a FX/CFD broker in the Seychelles
      • Labuan FSA
        Start a forex broker in Labuan
    • Liquidity
      • trading chart on a screen
        How do prop firms make money?
      • FXIFY Homepage
        What do prop trading firms do?
      • metatrader application on phone
        STP vs A-book for FX/CFD brokers
  • About
    • What is TradeInformer
    • Who runs TradeInformer?
    • Contact
YouTube LinkedIn WhatsApp
TradeInformer
YouTube LinkedIn WhatsApp
Subscribe
Home » Prime-of-prime-of-prime-of-prime

Prime-of-prime-of-prime-of-prime

March 13, 20226 Mins Read Newsletters
Share
Twitter LinkedIn Copy Link Telegram WhatsApp

Two things seemed to happen after ESMA introduced a wave of regulations on CFDs in August 2018.

One was that many firms realised they could circumvent the rules by only going for professional clients and/or redesignating existing clients as professional. This didn’t work because…

  1. Most existing clients couldn’t meet the requirements needed to be classified as professional.
  2. Most new clients couldn’t either.

The other thing was that many brokers suddenly decided to start offering ‘institutional’ services or, in some cases, a ‘prime-of-prime’ offering. 

A prime broker can provide things like access to margin trading on physical assets, margin trading on synthetics, clearing, and other custodial services. 

Prime-of-prime, at least to me, seems like it should be a company that provides prime brokerage-esque services to companies that can’t, probably because they don’t have the balance sheet to do it, gain access to mainstream prime brokerage services. 

The added caveat is those providing a prime-of-prime service should have that access. So if you are executing trades with a prime-of-prime, you’d expect that they have real prime brokerage relationships in place. 

It’s pretty clear that this is simply not the case for some companies purporting to offer prime-of-prime services. To be fair, this isn’t really new and some people have been pointing it out for a few years. And yet it still amazes me that there are brokers out there offering a ‘prime’ service when they are almost certainly just making a market on any order flow that gets sent their way.

One company that seems to have been growing, or at least upping its marketing spend a lot, over the past couple of years has some neat linguistic tricks to try and obfuscate the fact that this is very likely what they’re doing.

But all you have to do is dig through their order execution report to see that one of their ‘liquidity providers’ is also a major shareholder in the business. It’s not clear who their other liquidity providers are, so it may be the case that they’re making a market on all or most of the order flow which gets sent their way.

Another tactic is to call yourself a ‘prime-of-prime’ but then execute trades with….another prime-of-prime. Alternatively you can execute with a retail broker that runs a b-book.

For example, one company offering prime-of-prime services currently lists the companies in the picture above as its execution venues. Fair play to them for being transparent but those are all either brokers making a book or prime-of-primes. 

This Russian doll-like process can get even more ridiculous as sometimes you’ll have a company offering prime-of-prime services connecting to another company offering prime-of-prime, who in turn is executing with a prime-of-prime.

So in effect the company is a prime-of-prime-of-prime-of-prime. And if anyone had used the original company’s services, they could even start offering their own prime services and be a prime-of-prime-of-prime-of-prime-of-prime. Got that?

Block trades and bad execution

I was thinking about all of this recently because of some news that came out about Morgan Stanley’s block trading business. 

The investment bank is being investigated by regulators because it may have been leaking information to hedge funds about block sales that was then used to take a position in the market.

In short, Morgan Stanley would call fund managers and see if they were interested in participating in a block trade. The hedge fund would then short the relevant shares, knowing the sale would push the price down and that they could cover their short from it.

Reading the story made me wonder if prime-of-primes could end up doing something similar to their own liquidity providers. 

A few prime-of-primes appear to be connected to some of the same banks and non-bank market makers. You might expect that they’d get the same pricing as a result. But maybe not?

If you’re making a market on any asset then at some point you’ll end up being lopsided and have risk on your books.

For instance, if you make a market on a CFD on Tesla shares then you might at some point be in a position where…

  • You are short £500m
  • You are long £400m

The result is you have £100m of risk on your book. You could go to the underlying market and hedge that away. Alternatively you could improve your spread on the long side, making the price more competitive. Hopefully this will attract more buyers that help you offload your risk.

The problem here is that you can end up in something like a miniature short-squeeze. Revealing the better price is a bit like the Morgan Stanley bankers calling up hedge funds and saying they’ve got a big block of shares to sell – you’re signalling to the market that you have a position you want to unload.

Smart market participants may figure this out and then do the opposite of what you want. They know you’re going to move the market in their favour and can put pressure on you to make it happen.

Now imagine that you’re doing this regularly and feeding your prices to two prime-of-primes. 

In this instance…

  1. The first prime-of-prime executes trades that help you offload your risk
  2. The second prime-of-prime executes trades that increase your risk

If this happens all the time then at a certain point you might start to get very annoyed with the second prime-of-prime. In fact, you might think, “every time I show this idiot my better pricing, I get squeezed out of my position. From now on, this prime-of-prime doesn’t get my better prices.”

Assuming that did happen, then you could have two prime-of-primes using one or more of the same prime brokers but one would be getting better pricing than the other. 

Could this happen? It seems plausible. Does it happen? I have no idea. Was it fun to theorise that it might be happening? Reasonably.

Have a good week everybody.

Stuff that happened:

  • RUB trading is making life hard for brokers
  • eToro made a lot in revenue last year
  • ADSS has a new Chief Innovation Officer
Liquidity providers prime-of-prime
Next Article Should CFD providers add equities?

Related Posts

Plus500 options, India, event contracts, and MAGA

July 14, 2025

Will AI kill forex broker affiliates?

June 30, 2025

Last week in Limassol: 5 takeaways from Cyprus

June 23, 2025
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Latest News

Instant Funding $5,000 giveaway – 5,000 accounts, $500,000 in marketing spend

Prop Weekly July 18, 2025

Instant Funding is giving away unlimited free $5k challenges until it gets 5,000 funded accounts. Here’s why they’re doing it and how it works.

Spotware COO: Almost 50% of new traders download cTrader Store products

July 18, 2025

Exness stops onboarding clients in India

July 17, 2025
YouTube LinkedIn WhatsApp
  • News
    • Newsletters
    • Interviews
    • Broker News
    • Tech News
    • Guest Posts
  • Learn
    • Start a broker
    • FX CFD Licensing
    • Liquidity
  • About
    • What is TradeInformer
    • Who runs TradeInformer?
    • Contact
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
  • Follow
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    • WhatsApp
© 2025 TradeInformer

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.