Close Menu
  • News
    • Broker News
    • Tech News
    • Institutional trading
    • Interviews
  • Analysis
    • Newsletters
    • Prop Weekly
    • Marketing Newsletter
    • Guest Posts
  • Learn
    • Start a broker
    • FX CFD Licensing
    • Liquidity
    • Regulations
  • About
    • What is TradeInformer
    • Who runs TradeInformer?
    • Contact
  • Subscribe
LinkedIn WhatsApp YouTube
TradeInformer
Subscribe
  • News
    • Broker News
      • Exness branded youtube thumbnail for india
        Exness stops onboarding clients in India
      • crypto.com arena
        Exclusive: Crypto.com hires Leven Li to head MENA compliance
      • Damon Sze topwealthtrading managing director
        Ex-Hantec COO Damon Sze joins TopWealthTrading as Managing Director
    • Tech News
      • Fortress Core Connect and Shufti Pro branding
        Fortress Core Connect partners with Shufti Pro for AML/KYC technology
      • Team Force Technologies logo
        TeamForce Technologies integrates tech stack with cTrader platform
      • Trade Tech Solutions branding on black background
        Reward systems: The Game-Changer in prop trading technology
    • Institutional trading
      • Hilbert Group
        TradeLocker owner Deus X Capital invests $31m in Hilbert Group’s crypto treasury programme
      • ATFX Duke of Edinburgh
        ATFX Connect Joins the Duke of Edinburgh Cup City of London Qualifier 
      • Fortress Core Connect
        Fortress Core Connect gets FSCA License, strengthening local footprint in South Africa
    • Interviews
      • Yiota Hadjilouka from cTrader speaking at a panel at iFX Expo 2025
        Spotware COO: Almost 50% of new traders download cTrader Store products
      • Sam Eder, founder of broker MarketMates
        MarketMates Founder on prop, getting an ASIC license, and helping clients succeed
      • Gareth Hazelden
        Atlantic Capital Markets: Cornwall, Dubai, and a 77k client database
  • Analysis
    • Newsletters
      • Taxi in New Delhi
        Plus500 options, India, event contracts, and MAGA
      • best forex brokers UK search in Google AI Mode
        Will AI kill forex broker affiliates?
      • Limassol
        Last week in Limassol: 5 takeaways from Cyprus
    • Prop Weekly
      • Instant Funding $5,000 free challenge giveaway advertising
        Instant Funding $5,000 giveaway – 5,000 accounts, $500,000 in marketing spend
      • Trader Thomas Hartmann, owner of prop firm Funded Unicorn
        Did Funded Unicorn just cut and run with traders’ money?
      • TraxNYC picture from website
        Alpha Prime, diamond dealers, and Million Dollar Traders
    • Marketing Newsletter
      • Axi branding at Bahia football match
        Brokers are sponsoring EM sports teams
      • Pump those numbers
      • swissqote logo
        Does branding matter?
    • Guest Posts
      • Stanislav Galandzovskyi paid marketing specialist
        Where prop firms should (and shouldn’t) be looking next for growth
      • XM prizes
        XM Is Giving $500,000 in Prizes to Worldwide Partners
      • PropShield Centroid Solutions
        Centroid Solutions Announces PropShield: A Centralized Intelligence Platform to Protect the Integrity of Prop Trading Challenges
  • Learn
    • Start a broker
      • FTMO office
        How to start a prop firm for funded traders
      • Start a forex business (that isn’t a broker)
      • St Vincent and the Grenadines
        Cheapest country to start a forex broker
    • FX CFD Licensing
      • Mauritius airport
        FX/CFD license in Mauritius
      • Seychelles island
        Start a FX/CFD broker in the Seychelles
      • Labuan FSA
        Start a forex broker in Labuan
    • Liquidity
      • trading chart on a screen
        How do prop firms make money?
      • FXIFY Homepage
        What do prop trading firms do?
      • metatrader application on phone
        STP vs A-book for FX/CFD brokers
  • About
    • What is TradeInformer
    • Who runs TradeInformer?
    • Contact
YouTube LinkedIn WhatsApp
TradeInformer
YouTube LinkedIn WhatsApp
Subscribe
Home » The curious incident of the total output on the NAGA income statement

The curious incident of the total output on the NAGA income statement

January 23, 20236 Mins Read Newsletters
Share
Twitter LinkedIn Copy Link Telegram WhatsApp

Long term readers of this newsletter may remember some of the early pieces written here about the case for investing in Plus500 and CMC Markets. The short version is that CFD providers tend to have low valuations but good growth potential, no debt and impressive operating margins. 

One company that I have looked at intermittently but never in great depth is Naga, which is listed on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. Although the group has an entity in Germany, the majority of its employees and operations are in Cyprus.

Some readers may be familiar with the problems the company had with its accounts in the past, where the auditor (EY) was capitalising affiliate marketing costs, something it was not permitted to do under IFRS accounting standards.

To be fair, Plus500 has had a much more dramatic accounting lapse since being a publicly traded company and plenty of businesses have hiccups like this. Naga also fired EY, its prior auditor, and hired a new firm to do its accounts. However, looking through their latest accounts you wonder if maybe they should also fire them as well. 

Look at the income statement alone from the most recent half-year results and you start to notice some peculiar things. 

First there are the dates:

As you can see from the text at top, the period under review is supposed to be the first six months of 2022. However, the date listed below as a column header is from the start of 2021 to the middle of 2022 – ie. 18 months. So the dates are wrong.

Then we have the firm’s main revenues for the six month period:

Readers may notice that….

Revenues = 35,018

Capitalised programming services = 3,913

Total output = 38,932

But 35,018 + 3,913 = 38,931 

The likelihood is that there has been a rounding error, something which the company says may be present in the accounts, but it is still not a great look. Also note that capitalised is spelt incorrectly (“captialized”) in the accounts.

Readers may think all of this is nitpicking. Fair enough. But the next point is harder to put into that category.

If you look at the above image again, note that revenues are added to capitalised programming services to form something weirdly named ‘Total output’. Capitalising costs is a common accounting practice but Naga has undertaken it in a peculiar way. 

To summarise, if you are a company, you may not want to have the money you’ve spent developing software listed as an operating expense on your income statement. The kind interpretation of this is that you have effectively exchanged money for an asset, one that will hopefully increase your revenues in the future, so it makes sense not to expense it. The less kind interpretation is that you want to improve your profitability.

Instead of listing an operating expense, you decrease the relevant amount of cash on the balance sheet, then increase your assets. If it’s software, most likely it will be an intangible asset. This would also show up in the cash flow statement as an outflow equal to the amount it cost you. Finally, you would amortise/depreciate the cost in the income statement over a set period of time.

To give a very simple example of this, imagine you want to be an ice cream man. You set up a company and put £10,000 into it, then use £5,000 to buy an ice cream van.

Instead of reporting that as an operating expense, you reduce your cash holdings on the balance sheet by £5,000 and increase your fixed assets by £5,000. You report an outflow of £5,000 in the cash flow statement. Assuming you’re using the straight line method, you depreciate the cost of the ice cream van by £500 on the income statement every year for 10 years.

Naga has done the above except they have added the expense on to revenues to form what they nebulously term ‘Total output’. They then calculate their profitability for the period based on the ‘Total output’ figure, as opposed to revenue.

To understand what this means, go back to the ice cream van example. You have bought the van but are too lazy to be an ice cream van driver. You go to fill in your accounts. Your revenue is £0 but you add in ‘capitalised ice cream van costs’ of £5,000. Your ‘Total output’ is £5,000. 

If you were to follow the logic of Naga’s accounts, this would mean you ‘made’ £5,000 in sales during that period. But obviously you didn’t, you just spent £5,000 on a van. So at best you have an asset worth £5,000, £5,000 in cash and revenues of £0.

It’s plausible that I have got this wrong. Naga includes ‘development costs’ for IT as an operating expense for the period. However, it’s unclear if that is inclusive of the capitalised cost used to form total output, or if they are separate. Reading through the notes to the accounts, it seems like it is the latter, which would mean there is no offsetting taking place. That view is strengthened by looking at the investment in intangible assets component of the cash flow statement. 

None of the three major listed brokers in the UK structure their accounts this way, in fact I’ve never seen ‘Total output’ on an income statement anywhere before. Plus500 (whose accounts are extremely clear) treat software development as an operating cost and CMC, a far larger business than Naga which has also spent large sums on software development, capitalises far smaller amounts of that investment in its accounts relative to Naga.

Another option is that this is some kind of local accounting method. But these were purportedly put together under international accounting standards, meaning it’s hard to see how that would be the case.

My view is that it’s plausible Naga’s auditors have added the ‘Total output’ figure to improve their topline revenue and gain all the other benefits that come with that – higher net income, EPS, shareholder equity, and reduction of cash burn. As with most posts here, I’m happy to be corrected.

NAGA results
Previous ArticleIs it over for brokers in St Vincent?
Next Article Match-Trade doubles revenue in 2022, onboards 175 new customers

Related Posts

Where prop firms should (and shouldn’t) be looking next for growth

July 15, 2025

Plus500 options, India, event contracts, and MAGA

July 14, 2025

Will AI kill forex broker affiliates?

June 30, 2025
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Latest News

Instant Funding $5,000 giveaway – 5,000 accounts, $500,000 in marketing spend

Prop Weekly July 18, 2025

Instant Funding is giving away unlimited free $5k challenges until it gets 5,000 funded accounts. Here’s why they’re doing it and how it works.

Spotware COO: Almost 50% of new traders download cTrader Store products

July 18, 2025

Exness stops onboarding clients in India

July 17, 2025
YouTube LinkedIn WhatsApp
  • News
    • Newsletters
    • Interviews
    • Broker News
    • Tech News
    • Guest Posts
  • Learn
    • Start a broker
    • FX CFD Licensing
    • Liquidity
  • About
    • What is TradeInformer
    • Who runs TradeInformer?
    • Contact
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
  • Follow
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    • WhatsApp
© 2025 TradeInformer

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.